Region — US. Neutral scientific reference — not offered for sale here.
Set region
Vallydia
ExploreShopToolsJournalTrustSearch ⌕
Explore  /  NAD+ (and its precursors NMN / NR)
Research reference — not for sale

NAD+ (and its precursors NMN / NR)

A
lead outcome
Raising NAD⁺ levels (the biomarker)
grades vary by outcome ↓
Small molecule (non-peptide)
also called — NAD⁺ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)
longevity / healthy-aging (claimed)cellular energy / mitochondrialDNA repair / sirtuinsmetabolic

The longevity supplement everyone's heard of — where the biomarker reliably moves but the human benefits don't (yet). This is the register's most mainstream, most commercially enormous entry, and a textbook "elegant theory, iffy human data" case. Three threads: (1) it's not a peptide — a fundamental

In brief

NAD⁺ is a fundamental coenzyme (not a peptide) that powers energy metabolism, DNA repair, and the sirtuin "longevity" enzymes — and declines with age, which is the basis of a very elegant theory: top NAD⁺ back up (via precursors like NMN or NR) and you might slow aging. That theory, and Harvard scientist David Sinclair's public NMN use, helped build a multi-hundred-million-dollar supplement industry. The science is honest but sobering: NMN/NR reliably and safely raise blood NAD⁺, and the animal data are genuinely impressive — but in humans, a 2025 meta-analysis of 10 RCTs found no benefit for muscle, strength, or physical function, and metabolic trials mostly haven't reproduced the mouse results (promising signals exist in specific patient groups — prediabetes, Parkinson's, PAD — not healthy people). Add a female-only mouse-lifespan effect and a shaky resveratrol pairing, and the picture is: a real, important molecule with a reliable biomarker effect and a real evidence gap on the outcomes that matter. Whether that gap is "doesn't work" or "trials too short" (Sinclair's view) is genuinely unresolved. It anchors this register's NAD⁺ biology — the pathway that MOTS-c (#10), 5-Amino-1MQ (#59), and SLU-PP-332 (#60) all feed into.

Legal standing, by region
European Union
sold as a dietary supplement (NMN, NR, niacin/nicotinamide)

sold as a dietary supplement (NMN, NR, niacin/nicotinamide) and as IV NAD⁺ in wellness clinics. Note: NMN's US supplement status has been contested by the FDA (a regulatory grey area after NMN was investigated as a drug); NR is broadly sold. Not an approved anti-aging therapy anywhere.

Evidence, by outcome

An honest grade per outcome — drawn from the evidence, not any catalogue. Hype and undemonstrated marketing claims grade low.

OutcomeEvidence base · effectGrade
Raising NAD⁺ levels (the biomarker)
This grades "does it raise NAD⁺" — YES. It does not mean the downstream health claims are proven
Multiple RCTs: NMN/NR reliably ↑ blood NAD⁺ (~40–59% at modest doses), safely
A
Physical function / muscle / strength (healthy older adults)
The clearest negative: marker up, function unchanged
2025 meta-analysis, 10 RCTs: no benefit
F
Metabolic health (general)
Some signals; overall "iffy" per researchers
Human trials mostly failed to reproduce animal results
D
Specific clinical populations (prediabetes ♀, early Parkinson's, PAD)
Population-specific, preliminary, needs replication in large trials
Small trials with some promising results
C
Longevity / lifespan (humans)
Untestable short-term; the core claim is unproven in people
No human lifespan data; mouse data (female-biased)
F
Safety
Generally well-tolerated and safe short-term (a genuine plus); long-term/high-dose and IV-specific safety less characterised; NMN regulatory status contested
Extensive human exposure
B

Identity NAD⁺ is a coenzyme — not a peptide — present in every cell and required for hundreds of enzymatic reactions: the electron-transport chain (ATP/energy), the sirtuins (SIRT1–SIRT7) ("longevity" deacylases), PARPs (DNA repair), and CD38 (immune signalling). Because oral NAD⁺ itself is poorly absorbed, the market sells precursors — mainly NMN and NR — that cells convert into NAD⁺, plus IV NAD⁺ infusions. It's included in this (mostly peptide) register because it is the biochemical hub that several register compounds act through. ## Mechanism (as proposed) NAD⁺ cycles between oxidized (NAD⁺) and reduced (NADH) forms to shuttle electrons in energy metabolism (ATP production). It's also the required substrate for three big consumer classes: sirtuins (SIRT1–7, which deacetylate histones/proteins to regulate metabolism, stress resistance, and gene expression — the "longevity" link), PARPs (DNA-damage repair), and CD38 (whose age-related rise consumes NAD⁺). With age, NAD⁺ falls (more consumption, less synthesis), so sirtuin and repair capacity drop — the rationale for precursor supplementation. NMN and NR feed the salvage pathway to regenerate NAD⁺. All of this biochemistry is solid and non-controversial; what's unresolved is whether pushing NAD⁺ back up in humans actually restores youthful function — the biomarker moves reliably, the clinical outcomes so far mostly don't.

Sources — 5 cited
012025 meta-analysis (10 RCTs) — NMN/NR: no benefit for muscle mass/strength/physical function in older adults.
02Human NMN/NR trials showing reliable NAD⁺ elevation (~40–59%) and good tolerability; NPR/expert commentary ("pretty iffy" on functional benefits; promising in specific populations — prediabetes, Parkinson's, PAD).
03Sinclair et al. 2013 (NAD⁺ decline ↔ aging, the landmark); reviews of NAD⁺/sirtuin/PARP/CD38 biology (MDPI 2025).
04Mouse data: NMN lifespan extension female-biased; resveratrol reproducibility/lifespan controversies.
05FDA NMN supplement-status dispute (regulatory context). (No human lifespan data; healthy-population functional benefit unproven as of 2026.)
Review status
Not yet reviewed

A credentialed reviewer (PharmD / PhD / MD) will be named before this entry is finalised. Until then, treat it as a working draft. Last updated July 2026 (watch: longer/larger RCTs and the disease-specific trials — neurodegeneration, metabolic — that could finally close or confirm the biomarker-vs-outcome gap).

Grades reflect the published evidence, not our interest. No dosing, reconstitution, or administration is published for research compounds — that restraint is deliberate.

Related compounds
MOTS-cC
Peptide
5-Amino-1MQ (NNMT inhibitor)F
Small molecule (non-peptide)
SLU-PP-332 (ERR agonist / "exercise mimetic")F
Small molecule (non-peptide)
AICAR (Acadesine)F
Small molecule (non-peptide)
Epitalon (Epithalon)C
Peptide
Explore by goal
MetabolicLongevity & cellularMitochondrial
Vallydia

A neutral reference and a lawful-lane shop. Registered in Spain. Information for those who seek it — never promotion.

Region — United States
ExploreRegisterCategoriesTrust & COA
ShopCosmetic peptidesJournal
TermsPrivacyCookiesReturnsShippingImprint

This site provides neutral scientific reference and sells only products lawful in your region. Nothing here is medical advice, a recommendation, or an offer to supply unapproved medicines. No dosing or administration is published for research compounds. Cosmetic peptides per Regulation (EC) 1223/2009. Unapproved injectable peptides are neither sold nor advertised in the EU (Directive 2001/83/EC, Title VIII). © 2026 Vallydia SL — Registered in Spain.

NAD+ / NMN / NR — the longevity coenzyme: elegant theory, real biomarker rise, unproven human benefit · Vallydia