RegionInternational. Neutral scientific reference — not offered for sale here.
Cart · 0
Set region
Explore  /  NAD+ (and its precursors NMN / NR)
Research reference — not for sale

NAD+ (and its precursors NMN / NR)

A
lead outcome
Raising NAD⁺ levels (the biomarker)
grades vary by outcome ↓
Small molecule (non-peptide)
also called — NAD⁺ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)
longevity / healthy-aging (claimed)cellular energy / mitochondrialDNA repair / sirtuinsmetabolic

The longevity supplement everyone's heard of — where the biomarker reliably moves but the human benefits don't (yet). This is the register's most mainstream, most commercially enormous entry, and a textbook "elegant theory, iffy human data" case. Three threads: (1) it's not a peptide — a fundamental coenzyme — and anchors the biology that several register peptides (#10, #59, #60) converge on; (2) its theory is genuinely elegant (NAD+ falls with age → sirtuins/DNA-repair suffer → restore it → slow aging), championed by Harvard's David Sinclair; (3) the honest catch — supplements (NMN/NR) reliably raise blood NAD+, but a 2025 meta-analysis of 10 RCTs found no benefit for muscle, strength, or physical function in older adults. The gap between "moves the marker" and "changes outcomes" is the whole story.

In brief

NAD⁺ is a fundamental coenzyme (not a peptide) that powers energy metabolism, DNA repair, and the sirtuin "longevity" enzymes — and declines with age, which is the basis of a very elegant theory: top NAD⁺ back up (via precursors like NMN or NR) and you might slow aging. That theory, and Harvard scientist David Sinclair's public NMN use, helped build a multi-hundred-million-dollar supplement industry. The science is honest but sobering: NMN/NR reliably and safely raise blood NAD⁺, and the animal data are genuinely impressive — but in humans, a 2025 meta-analysis of 10 RCTs found no benefit for muscle, strength, or physical function, and metabolic trials mostly haven't reproduced the mouse results (promising signals exist in specific patient groups — prediabetes, Parkinson's, PAD — not healthy people). Add a female-only mouse-lifespan effect and a shaky resveratrol pairing, and the picture is: a real, important molecule with a reliable biomarker effect and a real evidence gap on the outcomes that matter. Whether that gap is "doesn't work" or "trials too short" (Sinclair's view) is genuinely unresolved. It anchors this register's NAD⁺ biology — the pathway that MOTS-c (#10), 5-Amino-1MQ (#59), and SLU-PP-332 (#60) all feed into.

Legal standing, by region
European Union
sold as a dietary supplement (NMN, NR, niacin/nicotinamide)

sold as a dietary supplement (NMN, NR, niacin/nicotinamide) and as IV NAD⁺ in wellness clinics. Note: NMN's US supplement status has been contested by the FDA (a regulatory grey area after NMN was investigated as a drug); NR is broadly sold. Not an approved anti-aging therapy anywhere.

Evidence, by outcome
How we grade →

An honest grade per outcome — drawn from the evidence, not any catalogue. Hype and undemonstrated marketing claims grade low.

OutcomeEvidence base · effectGrade
Raising NAD⁺ levels (the biomarker)
This grades "does it raise NAD⁺" — YES. It does not mean the downstream health claims are proven
Multiple RCTs: NMN/NR reliably ↑ blood NAD⁺ (~40–59% at modest doses), safely
A
Physical function / muscle / strength (healthy older adults)
The clearest negative: marker up, function unchanged
2025 meta-analysis, 10 RCTs: no benefit
F
Metabolic health (general)
Some signals; overall "iffy" per researchers
Human trials mostly failed to reproduce animal results
D
Specific clinical populations (prediabetes ♀, early Parkinson's, PAD)
Population-specific, preliminary, needs replication in large trials
Small trials with some promising results
C
Longevity / lifespan (humans)
Untestable short-term; the core claim is unproven in people
No human lifespan data; mouse data (female-biased)
F
Safety
Generally well-tolerated and safe short-term (a genuine plus); long-term/high-dose and IV-specific safety less characterised; NMN regulatory status contested
Extensive human exposure
B
Disclosure

Vallydia sells its own cosmetic serums, and some ingredients graded here belong to the same categories as those products. Grades are drawn from the published evidence by the method we publish, and applied to our own ingredients on the same terms — our copper-peptide serum is graded no more kindly than the peptides it competes with. We disclose the interest so you can weigh it.

Trade names shown here (for example Matrixyl, Argireline, Syn-Ake) are the property of their respective owners and are used only to identify the ingredient under discussion. Their appearance implies no affiliation with, or endorsement by, the proprietor.

Evidence changes

Get notified if this changes

We track new research and update these grades as the evidence moves. Leave your email and we'll tell you if the evidence for NAD+ (and its precursors NMN / NR) changes - nothing else.

One ingredient, one purpose. No marketing, no sharing. Unsubscribe anytime. See our privacy policy.

Identity

NAD⁺ is a coenzyme — not a peptide — present in every cell and required for hundreds of enzymatic reactions: the electron-transport chain (ATP/energy), the sirtuins (SIRT1–SIRT7) ("longevity" deacylases), PARPs (DNA repair), and CD38 (immune signalling). Because oral NAD⁺ itself is poorly absorbed, the market sells precursors — mainly NMN and NR — that cells convert into NAD⁺, plus IV NAD⁺ infusions. It's included in this (mostly peptide) register because it is the biochemical hub that several register compounds act through.

Mechanism (as proposed)

NAD⁺ cycles between oxidized (NAD⁺) and reduced (NADH) forms to shuttle electrons in energy metabolism (ATP production). It's also the required substrate for three big consumer classes: sirtuins (SIRT1–7, which deacetylate histones/proteins to regulate metabolism, stress resistance, and gene expression — the "longevity" link), PARPs (DNA-damage repair), and CD38 (whose age-related rise consumes NAD⁺). With age, NAD⁺ falls (more consumption, less synthesis), so sirtuin and repair capacity drop — the rationale for precursor supplementation. NMN and NR feed the salvage pathway to regenerate NAD⁺. All of this biochemistry is solid and non-controversial; what's unresolved is whether pushing NAD⁺ back up in humans actually restores youthful function — the biomarker moves reliably, the clinical outcomes so far mostly don't.

Chemical identifiers

Cross-reference identifiers for the authoritative external databases — not a recipe, and nothing about how to use it.

PubChem CID5892
InChIKeyBAWFJGJZGIEFAR-NNYOXOHSSA-N
SMILESC1=CC(=C[N+](=C1)[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O2)COP(=O)([O-])OP(=O)(O)OC[C@@H]3[C@H]([C@H]([C@@H](O3)N4C=NC5=C(N=CN=C54)N)O)O)O)O)C(=O)N
UNII0U46U6E8UK
DrugBankDB14128

via PubChem exact-name match (NAD+) · high confidence

Sources — 5 cited
012025 meta-analysis (10 RCTs) — NMN/NR: no benefit for muscle mass/strength/physical function in older adults.
02Human NMN/NR trials showing reliable NAD⁺ elevation (~40–59%) and good tolerability; NPR/expert commentary ("pretty iffy" on functional benefits; promising in specific populations — prediabetes, Parkinson's, PAD).
03Sinclair et al. 2013 (NAD⁺ decline ↔ aging, the landmark); reviews of NAD⁺/sirtuin/PARP/CD38 biology (MDPI 2025).
04Mouse data: NMN lifespan extension female-biased; resveratrol reproducibility/lifespan controversies.
05FDA NMN supplement-status dispute (regulatory context). (No human lifespan data; healthy-population functional benefit unproven as of 2026.)
Updated 2026-07-13 (watch: longer/larger RCTs and the disease-specific trials — neurodegeneration, metabolic — that could finally close or confirm the biomarker-vs-outcome gap)

Grades reflect the published evidence, not our interest. No dosing, reconstitution, or administration is published for research compounds — that restraint is deliberate.

Related compounds
MOTS-cC
Peptide
5-Amino-1MQ (NNMT inhibitor)F
Small molecule (non-peptide)
SLU-PP-332 (ERR agonist / "exercise mimetic")F
Small molecule (non-peptide)
AICAR (Acadesine)F
Small molecule (non-peptide)
Epitalon (Epithalon)C
Peptide
Explore by goal
MetabolicLongevity & cellularMitochondrial
Vallydia

A neutral reference and a lawful-lane shop. Information for those who seek it — never promotion.

RegionInternational
ExploreRegisterThe Register — full indexCategoriesTrust & COAHow we gradeOpen dataBrands
ShopCosmetic peptidesJournalQuizzes
TermsPrivacyCookiesReturnsShippingImprint

This site provides neutral scientific reference and sells only products lawful in your region. Nothing here is medical advice, a recommendation, or an offer to supply unapproved medicines. No dosing or administration is published for research compounds. Cosmetic peptides per Regulation (EC) 1223/2009. Unapproved injectable peptides are neither sold nor advertised in the EU (Directive 2001/83/EC, Title VIII). © 2026 Vallydia.