The longevity supplement everyone's heard of — where the biomarker reliably moves but the human benefits don't (yet). This is the register's most mainstream, most commercially enormous entry, and a textbook "elegant theory, iffy human data" case. Three threads: (1) it's not a peptide — a fundamental
NAD⁺ is a fundamental coenzyme (not a peptide) that powers energy metabolism, DNA repair, and the sirtuin "longevity" enzymes — and declines with age, which is the basis of a very elegant theory: top NAD⁺ back up (via precursors like NMN or NR) and you might slow aging. That theory, and Harvard scientist David Sinclair's public NMN use, helped build a multi-hundred-million-dollar supplement industry. The science is honest but sobering: NMN/NR reliably and safely raise blood NAD⁺, and the animal data are genuinely impressive — but in humans, a 2025 meta-analysis of 10 RCTs found no benefit for muscle, strength, or physical function, and metabolic trials mostly haven't reproduced the mouse results (promising signals exist in specific patient groups — prediabetes, Parkinson's, PAD — not healthy people). Add a female-only mouse-lifespan effect and a shaky resveratrol pairing, and the picture is: a real, important molecule with a reliable biomarker effect and a real evidence gap on the outcomes that matter. Whether that gap is "doesn't work" or "trials too short" (Sinclair's view) is genuinely unresolved. It anchors this register's NAD⁺ biology — the pathway that MOTS-c (#10), 5-Amino-1MQ (#59), and SLU-PP-332 (#60) all feed into.
sold as a dietary supplement (NMN, NR, niacin/nicotinamide) and as IV NAD⁺ in wellness clinics. Note: NMN's US supplement status has been contested by the FDA (a regulatory grey area after NMN was investigated as a drug); NR is broadly sold. Not an approved anti-aging therapy anywhere.
An honest grade per outcome — drawn from the evidence, not any catalogue. Hype and undemonstrated marketing claims grade low.
A credentialed reviewer (PharmD / PhD / MD) will be named before this entry is finalised. Until then, treat it as a working draft. Last updated July 2026 (watch: longer/larger RCTs and the disease-specific trials — neurodegeneration, metabolic — that could finally close or confirm the biomarker-vs-outcome gap).
Grades reflect the published evidence, not our interest. No dosing, reconstitution, or administration is published for research compounds — that restraint is deliberate.
A neutral reference and a lawful-lane shop. Registered in Spain. Information for those who seek it — never promotion.
This site provides neutral scientific reference and sells only products lawful in your region. Nothing here is medical advice, a recommendation, or an offer to supply unapproved medicines. No dosing or administration is published for research compounds. Cosmetic peptides per Regulation (EC) 1223/2009. Unapproved injectable peptides are neither sold nor advertised in the EU (Directive 2001/83/EC, Title VIII). © 2026 Vallydia SL — Registered in Spain.