The most hyped nootropic peptide — and the register's starkest "spectacular claims, collapsed foundation" case. Three points define this entry, and they close the cognitive cluster opposite Cerebrolysin (#43): (1) it rode a jaw-dropping claim — "10 million times more potent than BDNF" at building sy
Dihexa is a synthetic angiotensin-IV-derived peptide engineered to be orally active and cross into the brain, studied as a synapse-building (synaptogenic) cognitive enhancer via the HGF/c-Met growth-factor pathway. It became famous on a spectacular claim — ~10 million times more potent than BDNF at driving synaptogenesis in slice assays — which made it a nootropic-underground legend. The honest picture is sobering: all evidence is preclinical (cells and rodents), there are zero human trials, and the foundational mechanism papers were retracted in 2025 for fabricated data, with the responsible scientist (Leen Kawas) found "solely responsible" alongside the lab head. That same scientist ran Athira Pharma, whose related HGF/c-Met drug fosgonimeton failed its Alzheimer's trials — the only clinical test of this lineage, and it flopped. Add no safety data, a very long half-life, and the fact that HGF/c-Met is a validated cancer driver, and Dihexa becomes the register's clearest cautionary tale: an extraordinary claim resting on a collapsed foundation. It closes the cognitive cluster as the opposite of Cerebrolysin (#43) — not "lots of contested data," but "almost no legitimate data at all."
not approved anywhere; investigational research chemical. Not a cosmetic. No compounding pathway (reports indicate FDA removed it from interim Category-2 bulk-substance consideration).
An honest grade per outcome — drawn from the evidence, not any catalogue. Hype and undemonstrated marketing claims grade low.
A credentialed reviewer (PharmD / PhD / MD) will be named before this entry is finalised. Until then, treat it as a working draft. Last updated July 2026 (status: preclinical + retracted foundation + failed related clinical program; unlikely to improve without new, independent human data).
Grades reflect the published evidence, not our interest. No dosing, reconstitution, or administration is published for research compounds — that restraint is deliberate.
A neutral reference and a lawful-lane shop. Registered in Spain. Information for those who seek it — never promotion.
This site provides neutral scientific reference and sells only products lawful in your region. Nothing here is medical advice, a recommendation, or an offer to supply unapproved medicines. No dosing or administration is published for research compounds. Cosmetic peptides per Regulation (EC) 1223/2009. Unapproved injectable peptides are neither sold nor advertised in the EU (Directive 2001/83/EC, Title VIII). © 2026 Vallydia SL — Registered in Spain.